"
Two articles to read:
Davidhizar,R. and Cramer, C (2000). Gender Differences in Leadership in Health Professions. Health Care Manager 18(3),18-24.
and
Valentine,P.E.B. (2001). A Gender Perspective on Conflict Management Strategies of Nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 33:1,69-74
Now Please read an comment relative to:
1. Understanding article
2. Agree/disagree
3. Experience in nursing or other profession
4. Supplement with additional reading for your benefit in coming to understand yourself as a leader.
5. How has N321 changed or enhanced your understanding of Leadership...related to you!
You may comment in bullet form or narrative. I am interested in the content of your comment.
Thank you Dr Lg Hope Semester Break is safe and fun! I attached app of the Poster I am presenting in Montreal, Canada at 19th International Palliative Care Congress.
"
My Response:
Women such as Florence Nightingale, Elizabeth Seton, and
Elizabeth Kubler-Ross were all caregivers and leaders who have left a positive
impact in health care. These women had to overcome the barriers and stereotypes
that persisted about women and their leadership capabilities in a field of male
doctors and scientists. Nightingale’s principles of infection control such as
hand washing and proper nutrition are still the foundation of treating diseases
and staying healthy today. The fact is, men tend to be task-oriented leaders
while women tend to lead by engaging in behaviors that demonstrate agreement
with others and sociability. Women tend to lead through transformational
leadership that leads by establishing relationships based on trust and
confidence which serve as role models for other staff members to emulate, while
men tend to lead through the traditional model of authority and organized hierarchy
or transactional leadership. Again, not all men do, but women tend to lead with
transformational leadership rather than hierarchal leadership. Researchers are
actually finding that leadership effectiveness is strongly correlated with
transformational leadership. What this means is that to be a leader, we must
not just lead by example, we must also be friendly, pleasant, interested in
others, expressive, and socially sensitive as these attributes will help build
trust and confidence in relationships. Men do tend to lead through the
transactional type leadership where the results are only somewhat effective and
at times, actually hinder effectiveness. The reason for this is due to how and
where our society holds the bar for how men should behave. Because our society
feels that men should be direct and gung ho or have a- get things done no
matter what regardless of how it’s done- type of manner, men are less naturally
inclined to behave socially sensitive, expressive, agreeable, and focus less on
building trust in relationships than compared to that of women because of
unfortunate societal pressures. Regardless, everyone should learn to lead with what
is most effective. I do not think we should categorize the style men tend to lead
as men’s category and women’s style as women’s category. That type of divisive
and disparate dissection only leads to trouble and fosters a me vs. you
attitude when all along, the most effective method of leadership is to do the
exact opposite! And that is to build trust and confidence in relationships to
foster growth and healthy cooperation. Cooperation and meeting the needs of all
in society is what humanity as a whole needs to focus on. You can certainly say
that it is men’s style vs. women’s style and that is an acceptable perspective.
But that’s exactly it. These perspectives are all correct. It’s not that these
perspectives are not accurate descriptions; however, if they are all truths,
are you going to follow the perspective that is going to benefit you, or are
you going to support the divisive perspective just to attempt to stroke your
own ego? For me, I think the answer is clear.
Reference:
http://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=11397
<-- A Research Study called How Gender Disparities Drive Imbalances in Health Care Leadership
No comments:
Post a Comment